Digital protocol for the management of a patient with secondary edentia
Abstract
Currently, the development of 3D technologies in modern dentistry inspires precise planning of any dental procedure, taking into account all the details and nuances. Thanks to technological developments, it is becoming possible to create customized surgical templates and immediately load implants in a short time. Surgical navigation templates, in turn, help to install dental implants in the jaw tissue with high precision and without risks, which facilitates the accuracy of the orthopedic load.
Material and methods. During the discussion of the treatment plan, the patient chose the option of dental implantation using a navigational surgical template, with simultaneous loading on the implants. The resulting virtual impressions of the dentition were examined and combined with CT scans using software. A 3D image obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was loaded in DICOM format, then general landmarks were found from the image and on a virtual cast.
Conclusion. Modern treatment approaches make it possible to predict all outcomes of manipulations, and also improve the process of diagnosis and treatment of patients with secondary edentia.
About the Authors
I. R. ShafeevRussian Federation
Ufa
A. I. Bulgakova
Russian Federation
Ufa
E. A. Fakhritdinov
Russian Federation
Ufa
T. R. Basyrov
Russian Federation
Ufa
A. K. Gafuryanov
Russian Federation
Ufa
References
1. Zholudev S.E., Nersesyan P.M. Modern knowledge and clinical perspectives of use for positioning dental implants of surgical templates. Literature. The problems of dentistry. 2017;13(4):74. (In Russ)
2. Fadeeva M.R. [et al.] The use of compact osteotomy in the complex rehabilitation of patients with dentoalveolar anomalies and deformations. Bulletin of the Novgorod State University. 2017; 101(3):105-111. (In Russ)
3. Antonik P.M., Gvetadze R.S., Oganesyan A.S., Sarkisyan N.G. A digital workflow in the treatment of patients with temporomandibular joint disorders: a case report. Parodontologiya. 2023;28(2):195-204. (In Russ)
4. Jang H.W., Kang J.K., Lee K. [et al.] A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survive al rate of dental implants. J. Adv. Prosthodont. 2011;3:204-215. (in Engl)
5. Tian Y. [et al.] A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. National Library of Medicine. 2021: 9950131. (in Engl) doi: 10.1155/2021/9950131.
6. Aires I., Berger J. Planning Implant Placement on 3D Stereolithographic Models Applied with Immediate Loading of Implant-Supported Hybrid Prostheses After Multiple Extractions: A Case Series. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2016; Jan.-Feb., 31(1):172-178. (in Engl) doi: 10.11607/jomi.4186.
7. Biomechanics of dental implants: handbook for researchers. ed. Murat Cehreli. N.Y. : Nova Science Publishers, 2012:365. (in Engl)
8. Quirynen M., Herrera D., Teughels W. [et al.] Implant therapy: 40 years of experience. Periodontal. 2014;Oct., 66(1):7-12. (in Engl) doi: 10.1111/prd.12060.
9. Tsitsiashvili A.M. [et al.]Implant surgery in partially edentulous patients with alveolar bone deficiency. Stomatologiya. 2019;98(1):30-33. (in Engl)
10. Jokstad A. Osseointegration and Dental Implants. Wiley-Blackwell. 2015:488. (in Engl)
11. Lin, H. H., Lonic D., Lo L. J. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery − a literature review. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2018;117(7):547-558. (in Engl)
12. Lee C.T., Huang Y.W., Zhu L. [et al.] Prevalences of peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis : systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2017; Jul., 62:1-12. (in Engl) doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.04.011.
Review
For citations:
Shafeev I.R., Bulgakova A.I., Fakhritdinov E.A., Basyrov T.R., Gafuryanov A.K. Digital protocol for the management of a patient with secondary edentia. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2024;19(5):67-70. (In Russ.)