Preview

Bashkortostan Medical Journal

Advanced search

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in treatment of a female patient with multiple stones in the right kidney

Abstract

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was first performed in 2008 and consisted of simultaneous antegrade and retrograde approaches to the kidney. ECIRS combines two techniques: percutane nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery.
We present the experience of treating a female patient with multiple concrements of the right kidney.
Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) using a stone-free rate and complication rate by the Clavien-Dindo classification on the basis of the presented clinical study.
Material and methods. Patient B., 66 years old, was admitted to the Urology Unit No. 1 of the Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2 (Krasnodar, Russian Federation) with dragging pain in the lumbar region on the right side and a nephrostomy tube on the right. She underwent a complex of laboratory and imaging studies. The surgery was performed under spinal anesthesia. The patient was placed on the operating table in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position and underwent ECIRS on the right side (percutaneous nephrolithotomy with stone extraction + retrograde intrarenal surgery) and nephrostomy and ureteral stenting on the right side. The postoperative period went smoothly, and the patient had no complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Follow-up computed tomography showed no stones in the urinary system.
Conclusions. ECIRS is an updated, complete, and versatile version of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, which is a leading method in endourology and can be considered the new gold standard for treatment of patients with multiple kidney stones or staghorn nephrolithiasis. ECIRS allows for personalized stone management.

About the Authors

V. V. Sergeev
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2» Минздрава Краснодарского края; ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет», Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. N. Pavlov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет», Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. V. Churbakov
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2» Минздрава Краснодарского края
Russian Federation


S. A. Gabriel
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2» Минздрава Краснодарского края; ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. M. Durleshter
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2» Минздрава Краснодарского края; ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


Yu. Yu. Anosov
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2» Минздрава Краснодарского края
Russian Federation


References

1. Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, [et al.] Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology guidelines panel for urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):199-208. (In Engl.)

2. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, [et al.] Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54:1393-403. (In Engl.)

3. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, [et al.] Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):233-236. (In Engl.)

4. Proietti S, Rodríguez-Socarrás ME, Eisner B, [et al.] Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S381–S388. (In Engl.)

5. Hamamoto S, Yasui T, Okada A, [et al.] Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol. 2014;28(1):28-33. (In Engl.)

6. Cracco CM, Knoll T, Liatsikos EN, [et al.] Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(4):330-341. (In Engl.)

7. Wen J, Xu G, Du C, Wang B. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: a randomised controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2016;28:22-27. (In Engl.)

8. Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iba A, Kikkawa K, Hara I. Stone size is a predictor for residual stone and multiple procedures of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Scand J Urol. 2017;51(2):159-164. (In Engl.)

9. Usui K, Komeya M, Taguri M, [et al.] Minimally invasive versus standard endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a retrospective pilot study analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(7):1219–1225. (In Engl.)

10. Tabei T, Ito H, Usui K, [et al.] Risk factors of systemic inflammation response syndrome after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the modified Valdivia position. Int J Urol. 2016;23(8):687-692. (In Engl.)

11. Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Traxer O. The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: a systematic review. Asian J Urol. 2020;7(2):110-115. (In Engl.)

12. Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X, Noble M, Monga M. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology. 2013;81(2):251-256. (In Engl.)


Review

For citations:


Sergeev V.V., Pavlov V.N., Churbakov V.V., Gabriel S.A., Durleshter V.M., Anosov Yu.Yu. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in treatment of a female patient with multiple stones in the right kidney. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2025;20(1):98-103. (In Russ.)

Views: 25


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6209 (Print)