OVERLAPPING SURGERY IN UROLOGY AND OTHER SURGICAL SPECIALTIES
Abstract
Overlapping surgery is an approach to performing surgical interventions when the primary surgeon is involved in several operations with overlapping time, or the operating surgeon is changed during a simultaneous operation. This approach is practically not covered in the Russian scientific literature.
This article presents an overview of the features of the application of the overlapping surgery principle, and an assessment of the prospects for implementing this approach in simultaneous operations on the genitourinary system.
The main goal of overlapping is to improve the efficiency of surgeons and reduce patient waiting time. This practice is especially relevant in large medical centers and for complex surgical interventions.
The benefits include an increase in the number of operations, training of junior surgeons, and optimization of the use of surgical resources. However, there are risks associated with patient safety if the surgeon does not have time to respond to complications in time. It is important that patients are informed about this organization of operations and give their consent.
About the Authors
V. A. Vorobyov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России; ФГБОУ ВО «Иркутский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
A. R. Tukhiev
ФГБОУ ВО «Иркутский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
G. M. Khasanova
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
G. A. Galieva
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
R. T. Murzabaeva
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
G. A. Mavzyutova
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
L. I. Ratnikova
ФГБОУ ВО «Южно-Уральский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
V. Kh. Fazylov
Республиканский центр по профилактике и борьбе со СПИД и ИЗ МЗ РТ; ФГБОУ ВО «Казанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
V. N. Dubrovin
ФГБОУ ВО «Казанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России;
Россия
Россия
References
1. Smirnov A. V. [et al.]. Simultaneous surgeries in bariatric surgery (literature review). Klinicheskaya praktika. 2020;4(11):55–63. (in Engl)
2. Ahmed M. [et al.]. Overlapping Surgery in Orthopaedics: A Review of Efficacy, Surgical Costs, Surgical Outcomes, and Patient Safety. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2024;2(32):75–82. (in Engl)
3. Bandi P., Gupta D. Operating Room Staffing and Scheduling. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management. 2020;5(22):958–974. (in Engl)
4. Blake J. T., Carter M. W. Surgical process scheduling: a structured review. Journal of the Society for Health Systems. 1997;3(5):17–30. (in Engl)
5. Gartland R. M. [et al.]. Does overlapping surgery result in worse surgical outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Surgery. 2019;1(218):181–191. (in Engl)
6. Guan J. [et al.]. Managing overlapping surgery: an analysis of 1018 neurosurgical and spine cases. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2017;5(127):1096–1104. (in Engl)
7. Hoyt D. B. Overlapping Surgery: Safety Data and Ongoing Concerns. Annals of Surgery. 2017;4(265):645–646. (in Engl)
8. Hyder J. A. [et al.]. Safety of Overlapping Surgery at a High-volume Referral Center. Annals of Surgery. 2017;4(265):639–644. (in Engl)
9. Jackson R. L. The Business of Surgery. Health Management Technology. 2002;7 (23):20–22. (in Engl)
10. Kent M. [et al.]. Public Perceptions of Overlapping Surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2017;5(224):771-778.e4. (in Engl)
11. Khaniyev T., Kayış E., Güllü R. Next-day operating room scheduling with uncertain surgery durations: Exact analysis and heuristics. European Journal of Operational Research. 2020;1(286):49–62. (in Engl)
12. Kim R. G. [et al.]. Overlapping surgery in arthroplasty - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research: OTSR. 2023; 4 (109):103299. (in Engl)
13. Langerman A. Concurrent Surgery and Informed Consent. JAMA Surgery. 2016;7(151):601–602. (in Engl)
14. Leeds I. L. [et al.]. Increased Healthcare Utilization for Medical Comorbidities Prior to Surgery Improves Postoperative Outcomes. Annals of Surgery. 2020;1 (271):114. (in Engl)
15. Liu J. B. [et al.]. Outcomes of Concurrent Operations: Results From the American College of Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Annals of Surgery. 2017;3(266):411. (in Engl)
16. Livingston E. H. Overlapping Surgery and Perioperative Outcomes. JAMA. 2019;8(321):772. (in Engl)
17. Malahias M.-A. [et al.]. Outcomes and Patient Safety in Overlapping vs. Nonoverlapping Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2021;4(29):e1387–e1395. (in Engl)
18. Mello M. M., Livingston E. H. The Evolving Story of Overlapping Surgery. JAMA. 2017;3(318):233–234. (in Engl)
19. Meyerson S. L. [et al.]. Defining the autonomy gap: when expectations do not meet reality in the operating room. Journal of Surgical Education. 2014;6(71): e64-72. (in Engl)
20. Moore J. M. [et al.]. Simultaneous multisystem surgery: An important capability for the civilian trauma hospital. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2016;(148):13–16. (in Engl)
21. Oliver J. B. [et al.]. Association Between Operative Autonomy of Surgical Residents and Patient Outcomes. JAMA Surgery. 2022;3(157):211–219. (in Engl)
22. Pandit J. J., Ramachandran S. K., Pandit M. The effect of overlapping surgical scheduling on operating theatre productivity: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2022;9 (77):1030–1038. (in Engl)
23. Pernar L. I. M. [et al.]. An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 2017;11(31):4583–4596. (in Engl)
24. Schleer P. [et al.]. Augmentation of haptic feedback for teleoperated robotic surgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 2020;3 (15):515–529. (in Engl)
25. Stucky P. H., De Jong M. J. Surgical Team Familiarity: An Integrative Review. AORN Journal. 2021;1(113):64–75. (in Engl)
26. Zygourakis P. P. [et al.]. Comparison of Patient Outcomes in 3725 Overlapping vs 3633 Nonoverlapping Neurosurgical Procedures Using a Single Institution’s Clinical and Administrative Database. Neurosurgery. 2017;2(80):257–268. (in Engl)
27. Zygourakis P. P. [et al.]. Comparison of Patient Outcomes and Cost of Overlapping Versus Nonoverlapping Spine Surgery. World Neurosurgery. 2017; (100):658-664.e8. (in Engl)
28. Current State of Overlapping, Concurrent, and Multiple-Room Surgery in Otolaryngology: A National Survey - David M. Cognetti, Brian Nussenbaum, Michael J. Brenner, David H. Chi, Michael E. McCormick, Giri Venkatraman, Tingting Zhan, Alex J. McKinlay, 2017 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0194599817723897 (access date: 28.08.2024).
29. Concurrent and Overlapping Surgeries: Additional Measures Warranted. | PSNet [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/concurrent-and-overlapping-surgeries-additional-measures-warranted (access date: 08.09.2024).
Review
For citations:
Vorobyov V.A., Tukhiev A.R., Khasanova G.M., Galieva G.A., Murzabaeva R.T., Mavzyutova G.A., Ratnikova L.I., Fazylov V.Kh., Dubrovin V.N. OVERLAPPING SURGERY IN UROLOGY AND OTHER SURGICAL SPECIALTIES. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2024;19(6):84-89. (In Russ.)
Views:
65
JATS XML
Email this article 
