ХИРУРГИЧЕСКАЯ АНАТОМИЯ НЕРВОСБЕРЕГАЮЩЕЙ РОБОТ- АССИСТИРОВАННОЙ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ
Аннотация
Хирургическая анатомия нервосберегающей простатэктомии постоянно модернизируется и предлагаются новые объемы нервосбережения и виды улучшения функциональных результатов. В нашем обзоре представлены хирургические аспекты нервосбережения. Представлен наш опыт использования водоструйной диссекции сосудисто-нервных пучков с целью улучшения функциональных результатов после робот-ассистированной радикальной простатэктомии.
Об авторах
П. В. Глыбочко
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Ю. Г. Аляев
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Л. М. Рапопорт
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Е. А. Безруков
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
А. О. Морозов
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Г. А. Мартиросян
ФГБОУ ВО» Первый Московский государственный медицинский университет им. И.М. Сеченова» Минздрава России
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Радикальная хирургия рака предстательной железы / М. Коган, О. Лоран, С. Петров. - М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2006. - 352 с
2. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update / O. Yossepowitch [et al.] // European urology. - 2014. - T. 65, № 2. - C. 303-313
3. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE) / M.R. Cooperberg [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 2003. - T. 170, № 6. - C. S21-S27
4. Hsing A.W. Prostate cancer epidemiology / A.W. Hsing, A.P. Chokkalingam // Front Biosci. - 2006. - T. 11, № 5. - C. 1388-413
5. Диагностика и лечение ранних форм рака предстательной железы / А.Д. Каприн [и др.] // Вопросы онкологии. - 2009. - Т. 55, № 3. - С. 382-385
6. Заболеваемость злокачественными новообразованиями населения России / Г.В. Петрова [и др.] // Онкология. - 2014. - T. 5. - C. 5-10
7. Велиев, Е.И. Диагностика и результаты хирургического лечения локализованных и местнораспространенных форм рака предстательной железы / Е.И. Велиев, С.Б. Петров // Вопросы онкологии. - 2002. - T. 48, № 4-5. - C. 551-555
8. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975 2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer / B. K. Edwards [et al.] // Cancer. - 2014. - T. 120, № 9. - C. 1290-1314
9. Long term evaluation of survival, continence and potency (SCP) outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) / V.Ficarra [et al.] // BJU international. - 2013. - T. 112, № 3. - C. 338-345
10. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies / V. Ficarra[et al.] // European urology. - 2009. - T. 55, № 5. - C. 1037-1063
11. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a critical review of outcomes reported by high-volume centers / R.F. Coelho[et al.] // Journal of Endourology. - 2010. - T. 24, № 12. - C. 2003-2015
12. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes / D.L. Willis [et al.] // BJU international. - 2012. - T. 109, № 6. - C. 898-905
13. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: comparison of pentafecta rates for a single surgeon / A.D. Asimakopoulos [et al.]// Surgical endoscopy. - 2013. - T. 27, № 11. - C. 4297-4304
14. A prospective study of transition from laparoscopic to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: quality of life outcomes after 36-month follow-up / V. Berge [et al.] // Urology. - 2013. - T. 81, № 4. - C. 781-786
15. Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / F. Porpiglia [et al.] // European urology. - 2013. - T. 63, № 4. - C. 606-614
16. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot assisted nerve sparing radical prostatectomy / A.D. Asimakopoulos [et al.]// The journal of sexual medicine. - 2011. - T. 8, № 5. - C. 1503-1512
17. Walsh P.C. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention / P.C. Walsh, P.J. Donker // The Journal of urology. - 2002. - T. 167, № 2. - C. 1005-1010
18. A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers / A. Takenaka [et al.] // BJU international. - 2005. - T. 95, № 6. - C. 766-771
19. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the “Veil of Aphrodite” technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing / A.T. Savera [et al.] // European urology. - 2006. - T. 49, № 6. - C. 1065-1074
20. The Prostatic Capsule: Does It Exist?: Its Importance in the Staging and Treatment of Prostatic Carcinoma / A.G. Ayala [et al.] // The American journal of surgical pathology. - 1989. - T. 13, № 1. - C. 21-27
21. Intrafascial nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy / J.-U. Stolzenburg [et al.] // European urology. - 2008. - T. 53, № 5. - C. 931-940
22. Anatomic restoration technique of continence mechanism and preservation of puboprostatic collar: a novel modification to achieve early urinary continence in men undergoing robotic prostatectomy / A.K. Tewari [et al.] // Urology. - 2007. - T. 69, № 4. - C. 726-731
23. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy / J. Walz [et al.] // European urology. - 2010. - T. 57, № 2. - C. 179-192
24. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results / M. Menon [et al.]// European urology. - 2007. - T. 51, № 3. - C. 648-658
25. High anterior release of the levator fascia improves sexual function following open radical retropubic prostatectomy / M.E. Nielsen [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 2008. - T. 180, № 6. - C. 2557-2564
26. A histological study of Denonvilliers fascia and its relationship to the neurovascular bundle / J. Kourambas [et al.] // British journal of urology. - 1998. - T. 82. - C. 408-410
27. Costello A.J. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves / A.J. Costello, M. Brooks, O.J. Cole // BJU international. - 2004. - T. 94, № 7. - C. 1071-1076
28. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens / K. Kiyoshima [et al.] // Japanese journal of clinical oncology. - 2004. - T. 34, № 8. - C. 463-468
29. Anatomy of Denonvilliers' fascia and pelvic nerves, impotence, and implications for the colorectal surgeon / I. Lindsey [et al.] // British journal of surgery. - 2000. - T. 87, № 10. - C. 1288-1299
30. Invasion of Denonvilliers' fascia in radical prostatectomy specimens / A. Villers [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 1993. - T. 149, № 4. - C. 793-798
31. van Ophoven A. The anatomy and embryological origins of the fascia of Denonvilliers: a medico-historical debate / A. van Ophoven, S. Roth // The Journal of urology. - 1997. - T. 157, № 1. - C. 3-9
32. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis / H. Lepor [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 1985. - T. 133, № 2. - C. 207-212
33. Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy:‘curtain dissection’of the neurovascular bundle / A. Lunacek [et al.] // BJU international. - 2005. - T. 95, № 9. - C. 1226-1231
34. Epstein J. I. Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen // Urologic Clinics of North America. - 2001. - T. 28, № 3. - C. 567-594
35. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles/ D. Quinlan [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 1991. - T. 145, № 5. - C. 998-1002
36. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve sparing prostatectomy/ A. Tewari [et al.] // BJU international. - 2006. - T. 98, № 2. - C. 314-323
37. Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry / R. Ganzer [et al.] // European urology. - 2008. - T. 54, № 2. - C. 353-361
38. Division of autonomic nerves within the neurovascular bundles distally into corpora cavernosa and corpus spongiosum components: immunohistochemical confirmation with three-dimensional reconstruction / B. Alsaid [et al.] // European urology. - 2011. - T. 59, № 6. - C. 902-909
39. Cadaveric analysis of periprostatic nerve distribution: an anatomical basis for high anterior release during radical prostatectomy? / E.E. Clarebrough [et al.] // The Journal of urology. - 2011. - T. 185, № 4. - C. 1519-1525
40. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update / J. Walz [et al.] // European urology. - 2016. - T. 70, № 2. - C. 301-311
41. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies / L. Potdevin [et al.] // Journal of endourology. - 2009. - T. 23, № 9. - C. 1479-1484
42. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics / S. Shikanov [et al.] // Urology. - 2009. - T. 74, № 3. - C. 611-616
43. Second Prize: Pelvic neuroanatomy and innovative approaches to minimize nerve damage and maximize cancer control in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / J.I. Martinez-Salamanca [et al.] // Journal of Endourology. - 2008. - T. 22, № 6. - C. 1137-1146
44. Anatomic and technical considerations for optimizing recovery of sexual function during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy / S. Carter [et al.] // Current opinion in urology. - 2013. - T. 23, № 1. - C. 88-94
45. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy / J.-U. Stolzenburg [et al.] // European urology. - 2007. - T. 51, № 3. - C. 629-639
46. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel / F. Montorsi [et al.]// European urology. - 2012. - T. 62, № 3. - C. 368-381
47. Technical refinement and learning curve for attenuating neurapraxia during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve sexual function / M. Alemozaffar [et al.] // European urology. - 2012. - T. 61, № 6. - C. 1222-1228
48. Continence, potency and oncological outcomes after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: early trifecta results of a high volume sur- geon / V.R. Patel [et al.] // BJU international. - 2010. - T. 106, № 5. - C. 696-702
49. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009 / M. Menon [et al.] // European urology. - 2009. - T. 56, № 1. - C. 89-96
50. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / A. Kumar [et al.] // Journal of robotic surgery. - 2016. - T. 10, № 3. - C. 187-200
51. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk stratified approach to neural hammock sparing during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) / A.K. Tewari [et al.] // BJU international. - 2011. - T. 108, № 6b. - C. 984-992
52. Anatomic grading of nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / O. Schatloff [et al.] // European urology. - 2012. - T. 61, № 4. - C. 796-802
53. Retrospective analysis of the distance between the neurovascular bundle and prostate cancer foci in radical prostatectomy specimens: its clinical implication in nerve sparing surgery / S. Inoue [et al.] // BJU international. - 2009. - T. 104, № 8. - C. 1085-1090
54. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? / Y. H. Ko [et al.] // European urology. - 2013. - T. 63, № 1. - C. 169-177
55. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve sparing: An analysis of 154 consecutive patients / S. Kaul [et al.] // BJU international. - 2006. - T. 97, № 3. - C. 467-472
56. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation / G.W. Chien [et al.]// Urology. - 2005. - T. 66, № 2. - C. 419-423
57. A pilot study of laparoscopic Doppler ultrasound probe to map arterial vascular flow within the neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / K.K. Badani [et al.]// Prostate cancer. - 2013. - T. 2013
58. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation / T.E. Ahlering [et al.] // Urology. - 2005. - T. 65, № 5. - C. 994-997
59. Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence / D.S. Finley [et al.] // Urology. - 2009. - T. 73, № 4. - C. 691-696
60. Effect of a risk-stratified grade of nerve-sparing technique on early return of continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / A. Srivastava [et al.] // European urology. - 2013. - T. 63, № 3. - C. 438-444
61. The role of the prostatic vasculature as a landmark for nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / V.R. Patel [et al.] // European urology. - 2012. - T. 61, № 3. - C. 571-576
62. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing / D.S. Finley [et al.] / BJU international. - 2009. - T. 104, № 10. - C. 1484-1489
63. Bilateral vs unilateral laparoscopic intrafascial nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: evaluation of surgical and functional outcomes in 457 patients / F. Greco [et al.] // BJU international. - 2011. - T. 108, № 4. - C. 583-587
64. A prospective, non randomized trial comparing robot assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution / V. Ficarra [et al.] // BJU international. - 2009. - T. 104, № 4. - C. 534-539
65. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: A matched pair analysis / B. Rocco [et al.]// BJU international. - 2009. - T. 104, № 7. - C. 991-995
66. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: A matched comparison of open retropubic and robot assisted techniques / A.E. Krambeck [et al.] // BJU international. - 2009. - T. 103, № 4. - C. 448-453
67. Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / V.R. Patel [et al.] // European urology. - 2011. - T. 59, № 5. - C. 702-707
68. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes / K.J. Kowalczyk [et al.] // European urology. - 2011. - T. 60, № 3. - C. 536-547
69. Hydrodissection for preservation of neurovascular bundle during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy / K.A. Guru [et al.] // Canadian journal of urology. - 2008. - T. 15, № 2. - C. 4000
70. Hydrodissection of the neurovascular bundles during laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy: A new technique / P. Gargollo [et al.] // Journal of Urology. - 2004. - Vol. 171 - P. 522-522
71. Patel M.I. Hydrodissection of neurovascular bundles during open radical prostatectomy improves postoperative potency / M.I. Patel, D. Spernat, E. Lopez-Corona // The Journal of urology. - 2011. - T. 186, № 1. - C. 233-237
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Безруков Е.А., Морозов А.О., Мартиросян Г.А. ХИРУРГИЧЕСКАЯ АНАТОМИЯ НЕРВОСБЕРЕГАЮЩЕЙ РОБОТ- АССИСТИРОВАННОЙ РАДИКАЛЬНОЙ ПРОСТАТЭКТОМИИ. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2017;12(3):78-91.
For citation:
Glybochko P.V., Alyaev Yu.G., Rapoport L.M., Bezrukov E.A., Morozov A.O., Martirosyan G.A. SURGICAL ANATOMY OF NERVE SPARING ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2017;12(3):78-91. (In Russ.)
Просмотров:
56
Послать статью по эл. почте 
