Preview

Bashkortostan Medical Journal

Advanced search

SURGICAL APPROACH FOR PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY

Abstract

Partial nephrectomy (PN) provides comparable outcomes compared to radical nephrectomy and should be considered a priority intervention in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Material and methods. During the period of 2010–2022 we performed 173 PN. The mean age of the patients was 60.5±11.4 years. The male/female ratio was 1,14:1, the right-sided/left-sided localization of the tumor ratio was 1,04:1, respectively (р>0,05).
Results. Laparoscopic approach was used in 54.9%, open PN in 45.1% of patients. Regression analysis of groups of patients distributed according to access did not reveal any dependence on gender, age, comorbidity, side of the lesion, or body mass index. A positive correlation was registered for tumor size and resection complexity. The ratio between laparoscopic and open PN for tumors up to 4 cm (T1a) was 70.5% and 28.2%, respectively. In the group of patients having undergone laparoscopic PN, the median nephrometric index on the RENAL scale was 5.3 points, which was significantly less than in the group who underwent open PN, with this indicator equal to 10.4 (p<0.01). The median time of warm ischemia in open PN was significantly lower, amounting to 13.1 minutes, the same indicator in the laparoscopic PN group was 28.2 minutes (p<0.05).
Discussion. A retrospective analysis showed the heterogeneity of patient groups depending on the access used for PN. Open PN was used in patients with larger and more technically complex tumors, which was mainly dictated by oncological expediency and reduced risks of surgical complications.
Conclusion. The T category and the RENAL nephrometric index are decisive for the choice of approach for PN in patients with RCC. Open PN is associated with shorter ischemia time and a higher incidence of segmental (partial) ischemia. 

About the Authors

S. V. Shkodkin
ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»; ОГБУЗ «Белгородская областная клиническая больница Святителя Иоасафа»
Russian Federation


Y. B. Idashkin
ОГБУЗ «Белгородская областная клиническая больница Святителя Иоасафа»
Russian Federation


E. G. Ponomarev
ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»
Russian Federation


M. Z. Abed Alfattah Zubaidi
ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»
Russian Federation


V. Yu. Nechiporenko
ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»
Russian Federation


K. S. Shkodkin
ФГАОУ ВО «Белгородский государственный национальный исследовательский университет»
Russian Federation


References

1. Zhang M, Zhao Z, Duan X, Deng T, Cai C, Wu W, Zeng G. Partial versus radical nephrectomy for T1b-2N0M0 renal tumors: A propensity score matching study based on the SEER database. PLoS One. 2018; 28;13(2):e0193530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193530.

2. Mosoyan M.S., Al'-SHukri S.H., Esayan A.M., Kayukov I.G. Rannie kliniko-funkcional'nye pokazateli u bol'nyh rakom pochki, perenesshih rezekciyu pochki ili radikal'nuyu nefrehktomiyu. Nefrologiya. 2012;16:4:100-104.

3. Marchioni M, Preisser F, Bandini M, Nazzani S, Tian Z, Kapoor A, Cindolo L, Abdollah F, Tilki D, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Schips L, Karakiewicz PI. Comparison of Partial Versus Radical Nephrectomy Effect on Other-cause Mortality, Cancer-specific Mortality, and 30-day Mortality in Patients Older Than 75 Years. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;2. pii: S2405-4569(18)30008-7. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.007.

4. Puchkov K.V., Filimonov V.B., Krapivin A.A., Vasin R.V., Vasin I.V. Hirurgicheskoe lechenie raka pochki segodnya: laparoskopicheskaya radikal'naya nefrehktomiya i rezekciya pochki. Urologiya. 2008;1:47-53

5. Bertolo R, Garisto J, Dagenais J, Agudelo J, Armanyous S, Lioudis M, Kaouk J. Cold versus warm ischemia robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Comparison of functional outcomes in propensity-score matched «at risk» patients. J Endourol. 2018;21. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0383

6. Arora S, Rogers C. Partial Nephrectomy in Central Renal Tumors. J Endourol. 2018;32(S1):63-S67. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0046.

7. Shkodkin S.V., Tatarincev A.M., Idashkin Yu.B., Lyubushkin A.V., Fironov S.A. ehkstrakorporal'naya rezekciya pochki: a stoit li? Urologiya. 2016;3:62-69.

8. Serni S, Vittori G, Frizzi J, Mari A, Siena G, Lapini A, Carini M, Minervini A. Simple enucleation for the treatment of highly complex renal tumors: Perioperative, functional and oncological results. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41(7):934-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.019.

9. Calaway AC, Gondim DD, Flack CK, Jacob JM, Idrees MT, Boris RS. Anatomic comparison of traditional and enucleation partial nephrectomy specimens. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(5):221-226. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.005.

10. Mari A, Morselli S, Sessa F, Campi R, Di Maida F, Greco I, Siena G, Tuccio A, Vittori G, Serni S, Carini M, Minervini A. Impact of the off-clamp endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) of clinical T1 renal tumors on the postoperative renal function: Results from a matched-pair comparison. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(6):853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.093.


Review

For citations:


Shkodkin S.V., Idashkin Y.B., Ponomarev E.G., Abed Alfattah Zubaidi M.Z., Nechiporenko V.Yu., Shkodkin K.S. SURGICAL APPROACH FOR PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2023;18(1):36-39. (In Russ.)

Views: 144


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6209 (Print)