RESULTS OF USING FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY IN VARIOUS MODES OF LITHOTRIPSY
Abstract
Flexible ureterorenoscopy (URS) is one of the methods of choice for surgical treatment of kidney stones.
The objective of the study was to assess the risk of infectious complications in the postoperative period in patients after flexible URS using the modes «stone dusting» and «fragmentation with lithoextraction».
Material and methods. The study included 148 patients with kidney stones of up to 20 mm in size. The patients underwent flexible URS in the «stone dusting» and «fragmentation with lithoextraction» modes.
Results. The use of the «stone dusting» and «fragmentation with lithoextraction» modes shows good effectiveness in lithotripsy of kidney stones. The risk of infectious complications increases with the duration of the operation ≥ 49 minutes and the size of the concretion ≥ 14 mm by any mode of contact laser lithotripsy.
Conclusions. The «stone dusting» and «fragmentation with extraction « modes during flexible URS have the same risk of infectious complications.
About the Authors
B. V. Khanaliev
ФГБУ «Национальный медико-хирургический центр им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. V. Ivanov
ФГБУ «Национальный медико-хирургический центр им. Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ahmed R., El-Nahas, Shabir Almousawi Dusting versus fragmentation for renal stones during flexible ureteroscopy. Arab Journal of Urology. 2019; 17(2):1-5. (in Engl)
2. Geraghty R.M., Jones P., Somani B.K. Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review. J Endourol. 2017; 31(6): 547-556. (in Engl)
3. Javier, E. Santiago, Adam Hollander B., Soni Samit D. To Dust or Not To Dust: a Systematic Review of Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy Techniques. Endourology. 2017; 18(4):1125-1137. (in Engl)
4. Mitchell, R Humphreys, D Shah Ojas, Monga Manoj. Dusting versus Basketing during Ureteroscopy-Which Technique is More Efficacious? A Prospective Multicenter Trial from the EDGE Research Consortium. The Journal of urology. 2018; 199(5):1272-1276. (in Engl)
5. Sea J., Jonat L.M., Chew B.H. Optimal power settings for Holmium: YAG lithotripsy. J Urol. 2012;187(3):914-919. (in Engl)
6. Shulian Chen, Fu Ni, Cui Wei Comparison of Stone Dusting Efficiency When Using Different Energy Settings of Holmium: YAG Laser for Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy in The Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Calcul. Urology Journal. 2020; 17(3): 224-227. (in Engl)
7. Yong Xu, Min Zhiqian, Wan P Shaw, Nie Haibo Guangjun DuanComplications of retrograde intrarenal surgery classified by the modified Clavien grading system. Urolithiasis. 2018;46(2):197-202. (in Engl)
8. Bartosz Dybowski, Bres-Niewada Ewa, Rzeszutko Marzena, Tkaczyk Aleksandra, Woźniak Barbara, Wójcik Marta, Znajdek Zuzanna. Risk factors for infectious complications after retrograde intrarenal surgery - a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Cent European J Urol. 2021; 74(3): 437-445. (in Engl)
9. Martov, A.G. Nacional'nyj klinicheskie rekomendacii «Mochekamennaja bolezn'« Ministerstva Zdravoohranenija Rossijskoj Federacii 2020 g. (National clinical recommendation «Mochekamennaya bolezn» of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation in 2020) Urologija. 2020. [Electronic resource] URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/7_1#doc_a1 (accessed 09.07.2023).
Review
For citations:
Khanaliev B.V., Ivanov A.V. RESULTS OF USING FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY IN VARIOUS MODES OF LITHOTRIPSY. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2023;18(6):5-9. (In Russ.)
Views:
21
Email this article 
