Preview

Bashkortostan Medical Journal

Advanced search

USE OF CRANIAL BONE ALLOGRAFTS IN COMPARISON WITH ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS

Abstract

Selecting a graft for the surgical treatment of patients with cranial defects continues to remain an important issue in neurosurgery and maxillofacial surgery. Many pathologies of head tissue associated with severe cerebral edema, head wound infection, or decompressive craniotomy require removal of sections of the cranial bone. Defects that are not surgically covered can cause neurological and physiological disorders. Restoring the integrity of the skull is an important part of the rehabilitation of patients from the standpoint of medical, labor, and social rehabilitation.

Bone allografts have traditionally been used as a promising material for restoring cranial bones. They have become an indispensable tool in orthopedics and reconstructive surgery, capable of restoring functionality and quality of life of patients suffering from bone loss due to injury, disease, or congenital deformities.

In our review article, we examine global clinical experience in the use of bone allografts for cranial operations and new trends in their manufacturing. Recent advances in bone allograft manufacture are making a difference in bone allograft surgery, making it a more viable and effective option for patients in need.

About the Authors

T. I. Bikkuzin
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


B. S. Minasov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


O. R. Shangina
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


A. R. Bilyalov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


S. S. Chugunov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


K. V. Danilko
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


I. Sh. Akhatov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. N. Pavlov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


References

1. Belimgotov BK, Chochaeva AM, Khupsergenova IC. Autokranioplastika pri cherepno-mozgovoi travme i zabolevaniyakh kostei svoda cherepa (Autocranioplasty for traumatic brain injury and diseases of the bones of the cranial vault). III S''ezd neirokhirurgov Rossii: tezisy dokladov. Sankt-Peterburg, 2002: 632-633. (In Russ)

2. Bel'chenko VA. Rekonstruktsiya i endoprotezirovanie kraev i stenok glaznits, kostei svoda cherepa, verkhnei i srednei zon litsa (Reconstruction and endoprosthetics of the edges and walls of the eye sockets, bones of the cranial vault, upper and middle areas of the face). III S''ezd neirokhirurgov Rossii: tezisy dokladov. Sankt-Peterburg, 2002:634. (In Russ)

3. Kubrakov KM, Karpuk IY, Fedukovich AY. Rekonstruktivnaya alloplastika defektov kostei cherepa titanovymi implantami (Reconstructive alloplasty of skull bone defects with titanium implants). Novosti khirurgii. 2011; (1): 72-77. (In Russ)

4. Nigmatullin RT, Shcherbakov DA, Musina LM, Tkachev AA. Some aspects of clinical use of bone and cartilage allografts. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2012; (4): 78-83. (In Russ)

5. Stupak V.V. [et al.] Modern materials used to close defects of the bones of the skull. Modern problems of science and education. 2017: 1(4): 121-124. (In Russ)

6. Gaidar B.V. [et al.] Prakticheskaya neirokhirurgiya: rukovodstvo dlya vrachei (Practical Neurosurgery: a guide for doctors). SanktPeterburg: Gippokrat, 2002: 648. (In Russ)

7. Shchemelev AV. Rekonstruktivnaya khirurgiya defektov cherepa (Reconstructive surgery of skull defects) [Electronic resource]. 2009. – URL: content/konspekt_vracha /4055.html. (access date: 12.11.2023) (In Russ)

8. Shcherbakov D.A., Lebedeva A.I., Karimova A.I. Replacement of the anterior-lateral wall of the maxillary sinus with allografts. Genes & Cells. 2014; (2): 104-109. (In Russ)

9. Alkhaibary A., Alharbi A., Alnefaie N., Aloraidi A., Khairy S. Cranioplasty: A Comprehensive Review of the History, Materials, Surgical Aspects, and Complications. World Neurosurg. 2020; 139 – 445-452. (in Engl)

10. Brevi, B.C. Cranioplasty for repair of a large bone defect with autologous and homologous bone in children / B.C. Brevi, A.S. Magri, L. Toma, E. J. Sesenna // Pediatr Surg. ‒ 2010. ‒ Vol. 45, №4. ‒ P.17-20.

11. Canzi, G. Homologous Banked Bone Grafts for the Reconstruction of Large Cranial Defects in Pediatric Patients / G. Canzi, G. Talamonti, F. Mazzoleni, A. Bozzetti, D. Sozzi // J Craniofac Surg. – 2018. ‒ Vol.29, №8 – P. 2038-2042.

12. Chen, T.M. Cranioplasty using allogeneic perforated demineralized bone matrix with autogenous bone paste / T.M. Chen, H.J.Wang // Ann Plast Surg.‒ 2002. ‒ Vol.49, №3. ‒ P.272-2777.

13. Fu, K.J. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population / K.J. Fu, R.M.Barr, M.L. Kerr, M.N. Shah, S.A. Fletcher, D.I. Sandberg // J Craniofac Surg. ‒ 2016. ‒ №27(3). ‒ P.593-597.

14. Joffe, J. A prospective study of computer-aided design and manufacture of titanium plate for cranioplasty and its clinical outcome / Joffe J., Harris M., Kahugu F., Nicoll S., Linney A., Richards R. // Br. J. Neurosurg. – 1999. – N 13 (6). – Р. 576-580.

15. Josan, V.A. Cranioplasty in children / V.A. Josan, S. Sgouros, A.R. Walsh // Childs Nerv Syst. ‒ 2005. ‒ N 21. ‒ P. 200-204.

16. Moreira-Gonzalez, A. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up / A. Moreira-Gonzalez, I.T. Jackson, T. Miyawaki //. J Craniofac Surg. ‒ 2003. ‒ N 14- P. 144-153.

17. Miyake, H. A new technique for cranioplasty with L- shaped titanium plates and combination ceramic implants composed of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate (Ceratite) / H. Miyake, T. Ohta, H. Tanaka // J. Neurosurgery. – 2000. – N 46. – Р. 414-418.

18. Pabaney, A.H. Novel technique for cranial reconstruction following retrosigmoid craniectomy using demineralized bone matrix / A.H. Pabaney, K.A. Reinard, K. Asmaro // Clin Neurol Neurosurg. ‒ 2015. ‒ N136. ‒ P. 66-70.

19. Reddi A.N. Biochemical sequences in the transformation of normal fibroblasts in adolescent rats / A.N. Reddi, C. B. Huggens // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. ‒ 1972. ‒ Vol. 69. – P. 1601.

20. Robin, T. Wu., Persistent Cranial Defects After Endoscopic Sagittal Synostosis Surgery / T.Wu. Robin, R.M. Menard // J Craniofac Surg. – 2023. ‒ №34(1). – Р.368-373.

21. Salyer, K.E. Demineralized perforated bone implants in craniofacial surgery / K.E. Salyer, E. Gendler, J,L, Menendez //J Craniofac Surg. ‒ 1992. ‒ N3. ‒ P. 55-62.

22. Sicard, I.A. Cranial plastics using sterilized human cranial bone / I.A. Sicard, C. Dambrin // Presse Med. ‒ 1917. ‒ P.60.

23. Vanaclocha, V. Use of frozen cranial vault bone allografts in the repair of extensive cranial bone defects / V. Vanaclocha, A. Bazan, N. Saiz-Sapena, V. Paloma, M. Idoate //Acta Neurochir (Wien). ‒ 1997. ‒ N 139(7). ‒ P.653-660.

24. Vijfeijken, S.E.C.M. Autologous Bone Is Inferior to Alloplastic Cranioplasties: Safety of Autograft and Allograft Materials for Cranioplasties, a Systematic Review / S. E.C.M. Vijfeijken, T.J.A.G. Mu¨nker, R. Spijker, L.H.E. Karssemakers, W. P. Vandertop, A.G. Becking, D.T. Ubbink // World Neurosurg. – 2018. ‒ Vol.117 – P. 443-452.


Review

For citations:


Bikkuzin T.I., Minasov B.S., Shangina O.R., Bilyalov A.R., Chugunov S.S., Danilko K.V., Akhatov I.Sh., Pavlov V.N. USE OF CRANIAL BONE ALLOGRAFTS IN COMPARISON WITH ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2023;18(6):81-85. (In Russ.)

Views: 19


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6209 (Print)