Morphometric indicators of the radius bone in the aspect of prosthetic replacement of its proximal part
Abstract
Purpose of the study. To select morphometric parameters of the radius bone necessary for the most accurate description of its proximal part.
Material and methods. The material of the study was 82 macerated radius bones (38 male, 44 female) of people, the average age of which was 60.5±28.5 years old. Statistical processing of the research results was carried out using the Statistica 13 for Windows application package.
Results. The study showed that in osteometry of macerated radial bones, the selected parameters are 4-21% less than similar indicators obtained from autopsy of the elbow joints.
Conclusion. For a more detailed description of the proximal part and its most accurate modeling, it is necessary to take into account such parameters as: diameters and height of the head in the frontal and sagittal planes, depth of the articular fossa, length and width of the tuberosity, sagittal diameter of the proximal part in the area of the tuberosity.
About the Authors
A. O. Samokhina
ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
S. E. Shemyakov
ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yu. V. Chevzhik
ФГАОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова» Минздрава России
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Burkhart K., Wegmann K., Muller L., Gohlke F. Fractures of the Radial Head. Hand Clin. 2015;31(4):533-46. (in Russ) doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.06.003.
2. Alekseev V.P. Osteometrija. Metodika antropologicheskih issledovanij (Osteometry. Methodology of anthropological research). Moskva: izdatel'stvo «Nauka». 1966:89-93. (in Russ)
3. Eyberg B., McKee M. Indications and Clinical Results of Radial Head Replacement: Has Anything Changed? J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33 Suppl 8: S1-S6. (in Engl) doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001641.
4. Roidis N, Stevanovic M, Martirosian A, Abbott DD, McPherson EJ, Itamura JM. A radiographic study of proximal radius anatomy with implications in radial head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12:380-4. (in Engl)
5. Yeung C., Deluce S., Willing R., Johnson M., King G., Athwal G. Regional variations in cartilage thickness of the radial head: implications for prosthesis design. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Dec;40(12):2364-71e1. (in Engl) doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.09.005.
6. Kalantyrskaja V.A., Kljuchevskij V.V. Operativnoe lechenie perelomov golovki luchevoj kosti (Surgical treatment of fractures of the head of the radius). Mir nauki, kul'tury, obrazovanija. 2014;6 (49):586. (in Russ)
Review
For citations:
Samokhina A.O., Shemyakov S.E., Chevzhik Yu.V. Morphometric indicators of the radius bone in the aspect of prosthetic replacement of its proximal part. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2024;19(4):49-51. (In Russ.)
Views:
19
Email this article 
