Preview

Bashkortostan Medical Journal

Advanced search

EXPERIENCE OF ENDOSCOPIC COMBINED INTRARENAL SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF STAGHORN NEPHROLITHIASIS

Abstract

Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) was first described in 2008 and involved simultaneous use of antegrade and retrograde approaches to the renal calyx. These endoscopic techniques together improve the efficacy and emphasize clinical benefits of the combined approach in treating patients with staghorn nephrolithiasis.

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ECIRS by analyzing a stone-free rate and complication rate.

Material and methods. We assessed prospectively patients with staghorn kidney stones who underwent ECIRS between 2019 and 2024. We compared sex, age, body mass index, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels, number and types of surgical interventions, number of percutaneous approaches, surgery duration, length of hospital stay, and complications between the groups. The size and density of the stones were evaluated by unenhanced and contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography.

Results. Our study included 84 patients divided into groups according to the staghorn nephrolithiasis classification developed at the Lopatkin Scientific Research Institute of Urology (C1, 8 patients; C2, 14 patients; C3, 32 patients; C4, 30 patients). In 70 patients the stones were successfully removed in one surgery, and the stone-free rate effect was achieved. In C3 and C4 groups 6 and 8 patients, respectively, underwent repeated endoscopic interventions. In 4 cases in C3 group and 6 cases in C4 group additional percutaneous approach was required. The stone-free status and complication rates were 83.3% and 38.1%, respectively. Most complications (28.6%) were minor (fever, pain, gross hematuria). In 3 patients (9.4%) in C3 group and 4 patients (13.3%) in C4 group, antibiotic therapy was adjusted due to the development of acute pyelonephritis. One patient (3.3%) in C4 group was admitted to an intensive care unit due to sepsis. The length of hospital stay was 8.25±1.75 bed-days.

Conclusions. ECIRS will allow adaptation of the operation to a specific patient, to the size and localization of the calculi and the anatomy the urinary system. According to the results of the study, the method has a high level of safety and effectiveness, which will reduce the percentage of complications, the number of bed-days, the frequency of repeated interventions and percutaneous accesses to the kidney, it will also ensure a high rate of calculi absence.

About the Authors

V. V. Sergeev
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2»; ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. N. Pavlov
ФГБОУ ВО «Башкирский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


V. L. Medvedev
ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России; ГБУЗ «Научно-исследовательский институт – Краевая клиническая больница № 1 имени профессора С.В. Очаповского»
Russian Federation


V. V. Churbakov
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2»
Russian Federation


G. A. Palaguta
ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России; ГБУЗ «Научно-исследовательский институт – Краевая клиническая больница № 1 имени профессора С.В. Очаповского»
Russian Federation


S. A. Gabriel
ГБУЗ «Краевая клиническая больница № 2»; ФГБОУ ВО «Кубанский государственный медицинский университет» Минздрава России
Russian Federation


References

1. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM [et al.] Urologic Diseases in America Project. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol. 2012;62(1):160–165. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052

2. Rieu P. Lithiases d'infection. Ann Urol (Paris). 2005;39(1):16–29. (In French). PMID: 15830551. DOI: 10.1016/j.anuro.2005.01.001

3. Koga S, Arakaki Y, Matsuoka M [et al.] Staghorn calculi-long-term results of management. Br J Urol. 1991;68(2):122–124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1991.tb15278.x

4. Deane LA, Clayman RV. Advances in percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2007;34(3):383–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2007.04.002

5. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology; 2024. URL: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis

6. Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L [et al.]. Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology guidelines panel for urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus. 2023;9(1):199–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014

7. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M [et al.]. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1393–1403. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.073

8. Cracco CM, Scoffone CM. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) - tips and tricks to improve outcomes: a systematic review. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Supp. 1):S46–S57. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20282

9. Hamamoto S, Yasui T, Okada A [et al.]. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for large calculi: simultaneous use of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy overcomes the disadvantageous of percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol. 2014;28(1):28–33. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0361

10. Zhao F, Li J, Tang L, Li C. A comparative study of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the galdakao-modified supine valdivia (GMSV) position and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex nephrolithiasis: a retrospective singlecenter study. Urolithiasis. 2021;49(2):161–166. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01207-5

11. Kallidonis P, Tsaturyan A, Faria-Costa G [et al.]. Nonpapillary prone endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery: effectiveness, safety and tips, and tricks. World J Urol. 2022;40(12):3067–3074. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04178-x

12. Tiselius HG, Andersson A. Stone burden in an average Swedish population of stone formers requiring active stone removal: how can the stone size be estimated in the clinical routine? Eur Urol. 2003;43(3):275–281. DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00006-x

13. Nedbal C, Jahrreiss V, Cerrato C [et al.]. Current role of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones: a scoping review. Indian J Urol. 2023;39(4):274–284. DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_249_23

14. Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM [et al.]. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007;100(1):233–236. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06960.x

15. Proietti S, Rodríguez-Socarrás ME, Eisner B [et al].. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: tips and tricks. Transl Androl Urol. 2019;8(Suppl 4):S381–S388. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.07.09

16. Cracco CM, Knoll T, Liatsikos EN [et al]. Rigid-only versus combined rigid and flexible percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017;69(4):330–341. DOI: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02841-7

17. Wen J, Xu G, Du C, Wang B. Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible ureteroscope for partial staghorn calculi: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Surg. 2016;28:22–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.056

18. Leng S, Xie D, Zhong Y, Huang M. Combined Single-tract of minimally percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for staghorn calculi in oblique supine lithotomy position. Surg Innov. 2018;25(1):22–27. DOI: 10.1177/1553350617741023

19. Usui K, Komeya M, Taguri M [et al.]. Minimally invasive versus standard endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery for renal stones: a retrospective pilot study analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2020;52(7):1219–1225. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02433-x

20. Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iba A, [et al.]. Stone size is a predictor for residual stone and multiple procedures of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery. Scand J Urol. 2017;51(2):159–164. DOI: 10.1080/21681805.2017.1284897

21. Nuño de la Rosa I, Palmero JL, Miralles J [et al.]. A comparative study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in supine position and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery with flexible instrument. Actas Urol Esp. 2014;38(1):14–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.06.002

22. Schulster M, Small AC, Silva MV [et al.]. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery can accurately predict high stone clearance rates on postoperative CT. Urology. 2019;133:46–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.08.026

23. Tabei T, Ito H, Usui K [et al]. Risk factors of systemic inflammation response syndrome after endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in the modified Valdivia position. Int J Urol. 2016;23(8):687–692. DOI: 10.1111/iju.13124

24. Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S [et al.]. The role of ureteroscopy for treatment of staghorn calculi: a systematic review. Asian J Urol. 2020;7(2):110–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.10.012

25. Isac W, Rizkala E, Liu X [et al.]. Endoscopic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided renal access for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis. Urology. 2013;81(2):251–256. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.004

26. Chernyshev IV, Merinov DS, Epishov VA [et al.]. Retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of large and staghorn kidney stones. Experimental and clinical urology. 2012;(4):67-73.


Review

For citations:


Sergeev V.V., Pavlov V.N., Medvedev V.L., Churbakov V.V., Palaguta G.A., Gabriel S.A. EXPERIENCE OF ENDOSCOPIC COMBINED INTRARENAL SURGERY FOR TREATMENT OF STAGHORN NEPHROLITHIASIS. Bashkortostan Medical Journal. 2025;20(4):14-21. (In Russ.)

Views: 27


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-6209 (Print)